|
... more
The Mythical Moderate Muslim
Summary ... The moderate Muslim, along with the Big Foot, the unicorn, the Loch Ness monster, remains more elusive than a cure for cancer: there is at least a theoretical possibility that a cure for cancer can be found one day, unless of course Islam takes over and drags us all down into its own endless Dark Ages.
Primitive tribes offer sacrifices hoping to mollify whatever nonexistent beings they believe in.
The New York Times columnist Paul Krugman belongs to a very sophisticated tribe that, according to the recently retired Malaysian Prime Minister, rules the world by proxy.
One would think Mr. Krugman should be above such crude superstitions.
Nevertheless, in his column on October 21, he suggests that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld should fire General Boykin in order to mollify moderate Muslims.
General Boykin, the leading anti-terror expert at the Pentagon and a devout Christian, had openly and publicly, on several occasions, expressed his personal opinion of Islam, which happens to be rather low.
Considering where the terror is coming from, this is far less surprising than Mr. Krugman's eagerness to sacrifice both General Boykin and the First Amendment to mollify moderate Muslims.
I'd like to ask Mr. Krugman what gives him a reason to believe that the beings he is trying to mollify actually exist.
The official, politically correct point of view says that Islam is just another monotheistic religion, not that different from Judaism or Christianity.
If that is true, then moderate Muslims must exist, just like moderate members of other faiths.
However, moderate members of other faiths do not require sacrificial mollification -- that's basically how we tell moderates from extremists.
Therefore, either moderate Muslims are mythical creatures, or we need substantially different criteria to identify them.
That dilemma alone should make us suspicious as to whether Islam is "just another religion".
Obviously, it is important that we determine how a moderate Muslim can be distinguished from a Muslim extremist.
Why not ask Muslims themselves?
Irshad Manji, a young Canadian author, has published a book titled The Trouble With Islam
Since we don't hear too many Muslim voices criticizing their religion, her book deserves our attention.
This is what the author herself says on her Website:
"I appreciate that every faith has its share of literalists. Christians have their Evangelicals. Jews have the ultra-Orthodox. For God's sake, even Buddhists have fundamentalists. But what this book hammers home is that only in Islam the literalism is mainstream."
Apparently, the terms literalism and fundamentalism in the quotation above are used interchangeably, as synonyms of religious extremism. Unfortunately, the author fails to mention the most important difference between "literalists" in Islam and other religions. Evangelical Christians may believe that heaven is reserved for them alone.
Ultra-Orthodox Jews may display intimate understanding of the murkiest places in the Talmud.
I have no idea what extreme fundamentalist Buddhists do that sets them apart from their moderate coreligionists.
What I do know however is that no religion except Islam pursues the idea of physical extermination of those who believe differently.
The concept of holy war is unique to Islam.
Jihad is the absolute monopoly of Muslims.
There is no parallel to it in any other religion in the world. (Yes, I have heard about Crusades, but Christianity does not mandate them, and do you know when the last Crusade ended?)
So, here we have it in plain English, as simple as A, B, C:
- According to the Koran, holy war against the infidels is a sacred duty of every Muslim.
- According to Ms. Manji, mainstream Muslims interpret Koran literally.
The conclusion is inevitable: - Mainstream Muslims perceive war against the infidels -- meaning you and me -- as their sacred duty.
Once you understand that, you don't need books to explain to you what exactly the trouble with Islam is.
The trouble with Islam derives from the fact that mainstream Islam openly calls for murder of all infidels.
That's why Islam is not "just another religion". That's what, in my view, allows to classify all its followers as extremist.
What then, besides our stubborn, groundless faith in the general goodness of our fellow human beings, leads us to believe that moderate Muslims are not just a figment of our imagination?
How do they manifest themselves in the real world?
It would be utterly useless to look for them in Gaza, Judea, or Samaria.
Unlike bin Laden, terrorists occupying Israeli lands do not live in caves.
They live in small towns, villages and crowded refugee camps where everyone knows everything about everyone else.
They couldn't survive for a day without popular support.
When someone gives them a reason to doubt the sincerity of his support, they label him a collaborator and murder him on the spot.
Indeed, the PA-sponsored educational system guarantees that innocent children are indoctrinated in the most murderous variety of Islamic extremism -- thereby losing their innocence -- at the earliest possible age.
Therefore, in Israel, a moderate Muslim is a dead Muslim, which is bad news for those who want us to believe that there is a peaceful solution to the continuing Arab war against Israel.
Let's look elsewhere.
Afghanistan, liberated by the United States from the medieval tyranny of the Taliban is about to publish the draft of its first constitution.
Their new constitution is going to be firmly based on Islamic principles.
The country itself is soon to be renamed the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
We wouldn't call a Jew or a Christian who wanted his religion to become the basis of his country's constitution a moderate, would we?
Here, in the United States, we value the separation of church from state so much that we launch court battles to remove the Ten Commandments and every reference to God from everything that is even remotely related to the government.
If Islam is "just another religion", shouldn't the same criteria apply to Muslim countries?
And if the same criteria do apply, we have to conclude that President Karzai installed in Afghanistan by the American military and unable to survive now or in the foreseeable future without the American military presence, is not a moderate Muslim, but an outright religious extremist.
His "Very correct" remark to Mahadir's call for the extermination of Jews shows that he is a political extremist as well.
Therefore, the only practical question regarding Afghanistan is why did the United States have to waste lives of its soldiers and tens of billions of dollars in order to replace one bunch of Muslim extremists with another?
It might have been worthwhile had it improved our security at home, but, as we know, that didn't happen.
Therefore, we have to conclude that the United States has once again won a battle but lost the war.
Next, the same will inevitably happen in Iraq.
Desperate search for moderate Muslims goes all around the world.
It is especially urgent in Europe whose face is being irreversibly altered by mass immigration from Islamic countries.
Recently, the British government appealed to the growing British Muslim community to isolate extremists in their midst.
It's not hard to predict the response.
Actually, there will be no response, because everyone in any Muslim community is an extremist.
Such is the nature of Islam, and the only thing that I find hard to comprehend is the self-imposed blindness of the British government.
Apparently, such is the price of liberalism and political correctness. Bye-bye, Europe. We are next.
I don't think World War II could be won if the Allies, instead of eradicating Nazism, attempted to replace Nazi extremists with moderate Nazis.
Actually, nobody was looking for moderate Nazis during World War II.
But those were simpler, purer times.
Today, the mythical moderate Muslim remains the focal point of the US foreign policy in the Middle East.
The blind faith in his existence has already led the United States to many monumental failures, and many more are to be expected in the future.
Meanwhile, the moderate Muslim, along with the Big Foot, the unicorn, the Loch Ness monster, remains more elusive than a cure for cancer: there is at least a theoretical possibility that a cure for cancer can be found one day, unless of course Islam takes over and drags us all down into its own endless Dark Ages.
[ Published: November 07, 2003 ]
In Depth Analysis
Resistance and Rockets: Hamas Targeting of Israeli Civilians
Contrary to what the media and world leaders proclaim, Hamas's targeting of civilians is not an Israeli fabrication. The terrorist organization used its own elaborate media networks to publicize and praise attacks on civilian targets in Israel throughout the 2008-2009 Gaza war, despite its recent attempts to prove otherwise. Hamas views attacks on civilians as legitimate, appropriate, effective, and even heroic. In fact, such strikes are fundamental to its operations.
An Apartheid State or the Greatest Lie Ever Told?
[Republished to counter the "Sixth Annual Israeli Apartheid Week", March 1-14, 2010] It takes real chutzpah to attach the South African apartheid label to the democratic Jewish State of Israel. For the boot is truly on the other foot. Unlike the Judenrein Arab countries of the Middle East, the Jewish State neither believes in nor does it practice major nor minor racial apartheid. The way the Arabs use "Israeli apartheid" one might think they were protesting because Israel does not permit Arabs in their midst. Of course the very contrary is true. Some 20 percent of Israeli citizens are Arab — it is the Arabs who do not allow Jews in their midst.
UN blames Terrorists for Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan - Unlike Standards Used For Israel
A recent UN report on Afghanistan stands in stark contrast to the infamous Goldstone report issued by a United Nations' Human Rights Council. While the Goldstone report contained allegations of war crimes by the IDF, the UN report on Afghanistan did not blame the United States army or its allies for deaths of civilians who live near where the Taliban launched its attacks while using the civilian areas as a collective human shield.
Emet Blog
Are You Ready for Israeli Apartheid Week?
In case you're out of the loop, last Monday, March 1, 2010, marked the beginning of the 'Sixth Annual Israeli Apartheid Week'. It runs from March 1 — March 14, 2010. But no matter how you want to spin it, the definition of apartheid is racial segregation, nothing more. And in the case of Israel, nothing could be further from the truth. Unlike South Africa, Arabs are not segregated from the population in any manner. In fact, in many cases Israel goes to extreme lengths — sometimes to its own detriment — to appease the Arabs.
"I Support Israel; Let's Divide It"
There are many people who say they support Israel. And that's great! But for some people that also means supporting a "Palestinian" state carved out of Judea and Samaria, and that's not great. By saying they support the creation of an Arab state, they are saying that Israel is an "occupying power" in Judea and Samaria. They are, in fact, agreeing with the United Nation's stance on Israel — and the UN is not a supporter of Israel. Israel is a sovereign nation and must be treated as such.
US Economic Pressure on Israel Via Loan Guarantees? Don't Make Me Laugh
Sever Plocker comments on how people who still speak about "US economic pressure on Israel via loan guarantees" are completely disconnected from reality. He states that it is Israel who is now helping the US pay its deficits, and not the other way around. "This is why we were laughing, the American economists and myself, when the issue of loan guarantees came up in our conversation. I was laughing happily; they were laughing somewhat sadly."
Views/Commentary
Training the Palestinian Security Forces for What?
The United States and Europe provide training and high quality equipment for the Palestinian Authority "security forces" in order to fight terrorism. But instead the training and equipment are used by the Arabs for terrorist purposes. So, instead of preventing terrorism, the US and EU are actually supporting it. In fact, the US and EU are training the Arab terrorists for war against Israel.
Does Israel Need America?
Most people believe that Israel, as a nation, will collapse without the aid of the United States. The truth, however, is quite the opposite. Israel can survive on its own without the aid of the United States or any other country. But what people, including Israel, must realize is that Israel cannot survive without the God of Israel, the God who directs the affairs of men — and it would do Israel well to satisfy Him first.
Where is the Outrage?
Former Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion once noted that as long as Members of the Knesset are not individually elected, they are not accountable to the voters and the Government can choose to ignore public opinion. This is exactly what happened under the Ariel Sharon government and is happening now under the regime of Benjamin Netanyahu. It was not until he was elected that Netanyahu endorsed an Arab state carved out of Judea and Samaria.
Selected Reading
Does Israel Need America?
Most people believe that Israel, as a nation, will collapse without the aid of the United States. The truth, however, is quite the opposite. Israel can survive on its own without the aid of the United States or any other country. But what people, including Israel, must realize is that Israel cannot survive without the God of Israel, the God who directs the affairs of men — and it would do Israel well to satisfy Him first.
The Myth of 'Occupied' Territories
To determine the true legal status of the area known as Yesha (Judea, Samaria and Gaza), it is important to understand the different types of UN resolutions. Once this is understood, it becomes clear there is no such thing as the Israeli-occupied territories. (If anything, they are actually Arab-occupied territories.)
The History and Meaning of "Palestine" and "Palestinians"
Palestine has never existed . . . as an autonomous entity. There is no language known as Palestinian. There is no distinct Palestinian culture. There has never been a land known as Palestine governed by Palestinians. Palestinians are Arabs.
The Moslem Claim to Jerusalem is False
Is there any foundation to the Moslem argument that this "furthest mosque" (Al-Masujidi al-Aqtza) refers to what is today called the Aksa Mosque in Jerusalem? The answer is, none whatsoever.